Victim Blaming

According to the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime, victim blaming poop be defined as a devaluing act that occurs when the victim(s) of a aversion or an accident is held amenable in completely or in part for the crimes that adopt been committed against them. It can appear in forms of negative social response from dictatorial organizations (lawyers, police, and so on ) or from the victims social circle (friends, family, school, etc. ) towards the crime that has occurred. In our case, the crime that has occurred-or, more accurately, business leader occur-is ravishment.The exam question subtextually sends this message If you do non want to be sacked, do non behave this way. If you do non behave this way, rape will not happen. If we want to wear rape, should we not, instead, teach rapists almost the wrongness of nonconsensual sex (sexual intercourse part under the influence of alcohol does non count as consensual sex, explained in the next paragraph)? If w e keep telling our women to interbreed up and avoid trouble, we argon making no sweat to stop the assaulter. We cannot constantly tell women to run external when we atomic number 18 making no, or little, attempt to educate the men.We constantly vow conditions to rape if she was drunk, walking around alone at night, wearing clothing deemed provocative, etc. then it is not rape. In virtually cases, the victim is in a boozy state and therefore is unable to give proper consent. This is when they are taken value of and are raped. However, when someone is drunk they are insensible of their surroundings and therefore unaware of their actions. We cannot blame someone for getting raped while drunk. I agree that they should not get drunk in the premier(prenominal) place, but they are not responsible for another individuals actions.